Qualitative Dissertation Study Analysis LOCATE ANY QUALITATIVE Essay

Qualitative Dissertation Study Analysis LOCATE ANY qualitative DISSERTATION AND SUBMIT WITH ASSIGNMENT - Essay ExampleTwelve female season-ticket holders of university manpowers basketball, with no recent attendance at a womens basketball game, were interviewed using a semi-structured format (Farrell, 2006, p. 1). The system of logic behind this selection of interview subjects was simple. If Farrell had analyzed women who do not like frolics to determine why they do not watch womens sports, it would have led to too obvious a conclusion Women unspoiled do not like sports, women or mens. However, it does seem possible that women who like sports like mens sports, that there may be something about mens sports in particular that would get in them in particular, such that talking to either fans of womens sports or women who watch neither would be germane(predicate) as a control. Nonetheless, this choice of interview subject is designed to find people who not b atomic number 18ly lik e sports but also like them enough to buy a season-ticket pass to college games. Farrell (2006) pointed to research that identifies quaternion different categories of research interest characteristics of language, discovery of regularities, discerning meaning, and reflection. She also pointed out that qualitative and quantitative techniques be not strict binaries. For example, one quantitative technique, numerical and statistical analysis, is done on a essentially qualitative tool, a survey, by having people rank their beliefs from 1 to 7 or on some(prenominal) former(a) scale. Farrell defined qualitative research, in line with Golafshani (2003), as a naturalistic approach that seeks to actualise phenomena in context-specific settings, such as a real world setting where the researcher does not seek to manipulate the phenomenon of interest (p. 61). Theoretical Background Farrell (2006) used favorable seduceivism and critical theory for her interpretation, noting that many oth er approaches (positivism, pragmatism, interpretivism, postmodern techniques) are also equally viable. She defined social constructivism thusly Social constructivism asserts that humans construct knowledge using collective social instruments such as language and cultural practices (p. 62). A social constructivist argument would take it as a given that the category of women is not fixed, so there is no answer for Why dont women like womens sports? that has the form Because that is what women do or Women are genetically programmed only to like male gladiatorial rituals. If women do not like womens sports, it mustiness be a social factor acculturation, values, the failure of womens sports to appeal to their values or interests, etc. Farrell (2006) justified her use of critical theory thusly The study of women in sport is, in essence, a study of gender struggles against male hegemonic values embedded in the construction of sport as a male preserve. Critical theory lends itself well to a more deliberate investigation of the power structures of sport in this study (p. 63). Indeed, critical theory